

Hey guys, I found this videos on YouTube. They are long but give a snapshot of many stations tht have not previously recorded during that time period. Notable stations include : East Broadway, Essex St with blue titles. Also, Broadway-Lafayette prior to its renovation. As well as Grand Central-42nd St.
This videos were filmed for Transit District 4 Presentation. Raw footage of NYC Subway in 1990, lots of hidden treasures for those who were not around during that time!
Take a look I hope you guys enjoy!
As part of OpenHouseNew York Weekend, there's tour for 34th St-Hudson Yards train if anyone did not go there on Opening.
OpenHouse New York Weekend are popular to residents, transitfans, and tourists as well.
Since 34th St-Hudson Yard is reservation require, which mostly only cost $5 ticket. It used to be free reservation but they change to $5 because reservation sites are getting popular.
http://www.ohny.org/site-programs/weekend/sites/34th-st-hudson-yards-subway-station-7
34th St-Hudson Yards Subway StationSaturday, October 17:10:30 am~ 12:00 pmArchitect: Dattner Architects with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., 2015Additional: MTA Arts & DesignTwo of the City's newest amenities in the quickly emerging Hudson Yards neighborhood will be on display in this "meet the artist" and "walk the park" tour. First we view the new subway station mosaic artwork at 34th Street and 11th Avenue
commissioned by MTA Arts & Design for this gateway to the Chelsea gallery district, Far West Side and the Highline. Monumental artwork by Xenobia Bailey crowns the entry and ceiling dome inside the new station, and the artist will speak about her art practice, the transition of fiber and crocheted work to mosaic, her influences and philosophy of the aesthetic of funk. Following this discussion and tour, we will return to street level and be met by representatives from Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates (landscape architects) who will lead a walk through the newly opened Hudson Park with its many innovative features that make it a new oasis in a formerly industrial area. Be among the first to see these new gems in NYC.
Image Credit: Funktional Vibrations (2014) © Xenobia Bailey, NYCT 34th Street-Hudson Yards Station. Commissioned by Metropolitan Transportation Authority Arts & Design. Photo: Rob Wilson.
Advance Reservations will begin on October 7 at 11 am.
NEW CITY — Four new buses are now serving riders of Rockland County's TOR service, replacing some of the fleet's oldest vehicles.
The buses have a low-floor design to make it easier to get on and off. They also feature front door wheelchair access ramps, stop request buttons and bicycle racks.
The buses costs $1.5 million and were purchased using federal, state and local transportation funds, but no county tax dollars were used.
Gilling manufactured the buses — two 29-foot and two 35-foot vehicles — which run on ultra low sulfur diesel fuel and have engines that meet federal standards for capturing particulate matter.
Transport of Rockland operates 10 bus routes within the county, serving thousands of riders each day.
Four TOR buses from 1998 — three with more than 500,000 miles — were retired last year and the county bought four used buses from upstate to serve as back-ups. In the spring, the county added 19 new mini-buses to its TRIPS paratransit fleet.
http://www.lohud.com/story/news/transit/2015/10/07/rockland-adds-four-buses-tor-service/73460576/
I will be using the QM15 starting soon and need some feedback on how reliable service is particularly on Saturdays? I know service can be spotty on weekends, but the plan is to use the bus earlier in the day, which should make my commute easier. I'll be commuting from the Woodhaven/Lindenwood area. Any feedback would be appreciated.
I have SEPTA pope passes for sale, 4 for $9
Let me know if you are interested.
New York City and State Reach Agreement on M.T.A. Capital Plan
By EMMA G. FITZSIMMONS and ALEXANDER BURNS
OCT. 10, 2015
After months of tense debate over financing for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, state and city officials on Saturday announced a deal to pay for the agency’s five-year capital plan, with New York City agreeing to sharply increase its contribution to the M.T.A. to $2.5 billion.
The deal resolves a long and publicly contentious standoff between Gov.Andrew M. Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio over whether the city should pay significantly more toward the $29 billion plan, which will cover the cost of maintenance and improvements to the authority’s network of subways, buses and commuter rail lines.
Under the agreement, Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, pledged $8.3 billion in state funds to the authority. The city had initially agreed to provide $657 million, but senior aides in the de Blasio administration had recently held negotiations with representatives of the authority and the governor’s office over increasing the city’s contribution.
The final deal follows the broad outlines of a proposal offered in July by Thomas F. Prendergast, the chairman of the M.T.A., who suggested a framework that called for the state to contribute $8.3 billion and the city to contribute $3.2 billion.
In recent weeks, Mr. Prendergast, who was reappointed by Mr. Cuomo this year, had grown increasingly combative toward Mr. de Blasio, repeatedly calling on the city to pay more toward the capital plan.
Mr. de Blasio had said that as part of any agreement, he wanted assurances that the city’s contribution to the state-run authority would not be siphoned off and redirected to the state budget. City officials had urged Mr. Cuomo to provide more details about how the state would pay its share and argued that the city should have more say in which projects were addressed in the capital plan.
In a joint statement outlining the deal, Mr. Cuomo, city and state officials said on Saturday that New York’s $2.5 billion contribution would pay for projects in the city “with priority consideration given for projects and timing based on input” from New York City.
In announcing the agreement, both Mr. de Blasio and Mr. Cuomo backed away from the often-heated rhetoric they have used lately when discussing the M.T.A. Mr. de Blasio, a Democrat, said in a statement that the $2.5 billion contribution by the city represented an “historic investment — the city’s largest ever general capital contribution — while ensuring that New York City dollars stay in New York transit.”
The deal, Mr. Cuomo said in a statement, “would not have been possible without everyone stepping up to pay their fair share.”
“Today with this agreement, we are making an historic investment not only in the M.T.A., but in the future of New York,” he said.
The capital plan will pay for a series of projects across the system: new train cars and buses; updated signal systems that would allow more trains to run; countdown clocks for the lettered subway lines; and the next phase of the Second Avenue subway line. The upgrades come at a critical time for the authority: The city’s aging subway system is struggling to handle booming ridership and has experienced rising delays and overcrowding.
The authority has faced months of uncertainty over the capital plan, which officials said had been subject to an unprecedented delay. After a subway derailment in Brooklyn last month, Mr. Prendergast forcefully urged the city to pay more for the plan, noting that it would allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to repair and rebuild subway structures, including tunnel walls like the one involved in the crash.
Rider advocacy groups and Transport Workers Union Local 100, the union that represents subway and bus workers, had also pressed the city to increase its funding. And a report by the city’s Independent Budget Office found that the city’s payments to the capital plan over the years had not kept pace with inflation.
With the city’s final contribution falling short of Mr. Prendergast’s $3.2 billion request, an M.T.A. spokesman said on Saturday that the authority would engage in a “serious effort” to wring $700 million in additional savings from the transit system.
The spokesman, Adam Lisberg, said the authority was “confident we can reach that without any major cuts.”
As some of you may recall, the IRT fleet was painted white in the 1980s before the TA switched over to red. But over the years, I've seen at least two pictures of individual B Division cars painted in this "whitebird" (for lack of a better term) paint scheme around the same time. Does anyone know if the painting B Division cars was part of a program (like the IRT) or was it a spontaneous thing that only happened individually? I'd appreciate any info.
So I had a chance to ride some of the newest Prevosts last Tuesday night to and from Staten Island, and there are a few differences between these and the 2400s.
Pros:
-Easier to adjust seating. The 2400s have a really annoying seat adjustment set up. The seats on the newer Prevosts are very similar if not identical to what can be found on newer MCI express buses.
-Display signage is easy on the eyes. I like the display signage on these buses MUCH more than on the 2400s. It's more appealing to look at too.
-They've fixed the horrendous logo on these. The 2400s that haven't been repainted yet all have that hideous
logo on them. Makes the buses look even uglier.
Cons:
-Leg room is still horrible. I can't seem to put my finger on this one, but it's something I wondered about both going to Staten Island and coming back. Going to Staten Island, I had extra leg room only because it was a wheelchair seat. However, there was absolutely no room for anyone to sit behind me, which meant two seats couldn't be used. Luckily the bus I was on wasn't too crowded, otherwise it would've been a problem. I switched my seat twice coming to and from Staten Island in part because of the lack of leg room. Even with the chairs in front of me completely upright, I still felt cramped coming back.
-The Stop Request button is TOO loud. I was starting to get a headache on the way back because the noise associated with the bell is right in your ear and it becomes quite annoying. Between the lack of leg room and those redundant automated announcements, I couldn't wait to get off and make my way over to the BxM1.
-Climate control is too much. I usually don't complain, but I was quite irritated with how high the AC was on. It wasn't exactly that warm out so I don't know why the AC was on full blast as if it was 90 degrees out. If it's that bad now, surely folks will be freezing come winter time.
All in all while I like the design of these over the 2400s, I would not be thrilled to have to use these on a daily basis, even with the possibility of being able to charge my phone. My hope is that MCI can win the next order. These buses are quite expensive and quite frankly, the should've gotten some feedback from riders before these new ones hit the streets, similar to what they did with the new Metro-North trains. I have heard similar complaints from other Staten Islanders. Sure, it's nice to have new buses, but these could've been better, particularly in terms of leg room. I wonder if there are more seats on these buses, because I can't understand why leg room is such an issue.
NYC's subway signal system: How it keeps trains from colliding and other things you probably never knew @amNewYork http://www.amny.com/transit/nyc-s-subway-signal-system-how-it-keeps-trains-from-colliding-and-other-secrets-1.10963334
It takes too much effort to copy and paste an amny article.
Sorry to get off topic guys, but wanted to spread the word... for those who live anywhere from Camden to Cape May, you can catch LOCAL news at 7pm and 11pm Monday through Friday on Channel 26 (Atlantic and Cape May Counties), Channel 4 everywhere else. DISH, FiOS, Direct TV and over the air 4.1
Mike Frankel is our sports director, Cara McCollum lead anchor and yours truly Chief Meteorologist.
You can find out more on our website: www.snjtoday.com and for local weather coverage "Like" my facebook: www.facebook.com/noreasternick